• Timezone: America/Indiana/Indianapolis
  • GCal Events: Cache is set to sites/all/modules/gcal_events/cache
  • GCal Events: Cache duration is 3600 seconds
  • GCal Events[Events Calendar] FeedURL
  • GCal Events[Events Calendar] Feed Init took 0.090476989746094 seconds
GCal Events[Events Calendar] A feed could not be found at http://www.google.com/calendar/feeds/ualbanyitlal@gmail.com/public/full?max-results=2500&orderby=starttime&singleevents=true&futureevents=true

What is the difference between “assessment” and “evaluation?”

Confusion reigns over these two terms, and their usage wanders, depending on context. In this book we will use the following distinction:

Assessment is the process of objectively understanding the state or condition of a thing, by observation and measurement. Assessment of teaching means taking a measure of its effectiveness. “Formative” assessment is measurement for the purpose of improving it. “Summative” assessment is what we normally call “evaluation.”

 

Evaluation is the process of observing and measuring a thing for the purpose of judging it and of determining its “value,” either by comparison to similar things, or to a standard. Evaluation of teaching means passing judgment on it as part of an administrative process.

 

Ideally, a fair and comprehensive plan to evaluate teaching would incorporate many data points drawn from a broad array of teaching dimensions. Such a plan would include not only student surveys, but also self-assessments, documentation of instructional planning and design, evidence of scholarly activity to improve teaching, and most importantly, evidence of student learning outcomes.

 

But that is not all. A comprehensive evaluation of teaching would necessarily include various types of peer assessment, more commonly referred to as “peer observation.”